不知道啥时候炸了的,今天看了一眼维护公告…
公告: **_受影响的节点:AMSD025、AMSD026、AMSD028、AMSD029 我们目前正在调查阿姆斯特丹的服务意外中断。一旦我们有关于这些服务状态的更新,我们会立即通知您。_** 似乎不是计划中的服务器移动。但是,它仍然可能是,或者无论如何都可以花时间去做。 我在 029 号(欧洲中部标准时间 22:35)宕机之前经历的事情是,从 22:10(欧洲中部标准时间)开始,它多次离线和在线。所以更换并不是我第一个想到发生的事情。
更新: 阿姆斯特丹,我们在网络问题发生时制造了它,我正在努力解决它。我们想安排对这些设备的维护,但他们推进得太快了(我想这可能是件好事),但他们也错误地进行了维护,因此他们没有重新上线。 阿姆斯特丹服务器各有一个 4TB 和 2TB 驱动器。我们要求移除 4TB 驱动器 (XPG) 并添加 2 个 2TB NVMe。但看起来他们移除了 4TB 和 2TB 驱动器,2TB 是带有虚拟机的驱动器。 我假设他们没有标记他们删除的内容,因为他们删除了两个驱动器(未要求),但希望我们可以及时将它们恢复到正确的服务器中。
原文(公告): **_Affected nodes: AMSD025, AMSD026, AMSD028, AMSD029 We are currently investigating an unexpected outage with services in Amsterdam. We will let you know as soon as we have an update regarding the status of these services._** Doesn’t seem to be the planned moving of servers. However, it still could be, or the moment could be taken to do it anyway. What I experienced just before mine on 029 went down (22:35 CEST) was that starting at 22:10 (CEST) it went offline and online several times. So the replacement wasn’t really my first thought of what was happening.
原文(更新): Amsterdam, we created the network issue as it happened and I’m working to resolve it. We wanted to schedule maintenance on these but they moved forward with it too quickly (which I guess could be a good thing) but they also did the maintenance incorrectly hence why they didn’t come back online. Amsterdam servers had a 4TB and 2TB drive each. We requested 4TB drives be removed (XPG) and 2 x 2TB NVMe added instead. But it looks like they removed both 4TB and 2TB drives, the 2TB being the drives with VMs on them. I’m assuming they didn’t label what they removed since they removed both drives (not requested) but hopefully we can get them back in the right servers in a timely manner. |