| 本来想着买个腾讯云的硅谷 做源站，用deepvm的做前端，
万万没想到 ping一下 竟然有 157ms
deepvm和 腾讯云的硅谷 都是美国西部，没理由呀
这157ms的延迟 做后端有点不太理想呀
64 bytes from 43.130.61.*: icmp_seq=1 ttl=51 time=157 ms
64 bytes from 43.130.61.*: icmp_seq=2 ttl=51 time=157 ms
64 bytes from 43.130.61.*: icmp_seq=3 ttl=51 time=162 ms
64 bytes from 43.130.61.*: icmp_seq=4 ttl=51 time=157 ms
我又试了 kurun的和腾讯云的硅谷 ping一下
64 bytes from 43.130.61.*: icmp_seq=1 ttl=50 time=27.1 ms
64 bytes from 43.130.61.*: icmp_seq=2 ttl=50 time=10.0 ms
64 bytes from 43.130.61.*: icmp_seq=3 ttl=50 time=10.0 ms
64 bytes from 43.130.61.*: icmp_seq=4 ttl=50 time=10.0 ms
64 bytes from 43.130.61.*: icmp_seq=5 ttl=50 time=10.1 ms
64 bytes from 43.130.61.*: icmp_seq=6 ttl=50 time=10.1 ms
64 bytes from 43.130.61.*: icmp_seq=7 ttl=50 time=9.92 ms
属于正常
—
又试了 kurun和 deepvm ping一下
64 bytes from 154.19.242.*: icmp_seq=2 ttl=59 time=0.639 ms
64 bytes from 154.19.242.*: icmp_seq=3 ttl=59 time=2.46 ms
64 bytes from 154.19.242.*: icmp_seq=4 ttl=59 time=0.662 ms
64 bytes from 154.19.242.*: icmp_seq=5 ttl=59 time=1.05 ms
64 bytes from 154.19.242.*: icmp_seq=6 ttl=59 time=0.661 ms
也正常呀
–
|
