| 公告如下： -过度讨论规章制度的变化（在主持人结束主题时，177篇帖子中有47篇是关于该主题的），这造成了恐惧、不确定性和怀疑的气氛，鼓励了其他社区成员越来越多的情绪反应。后来的投票结果显示，81%的人支持最具争议的章程修改，这表明争议被夸大了。 -捍卫“反向种族主义”和“反向性别歧视”，这些概念没有经验证据的支持，可以被视为蓄意恐吓或创造排斥环境。 -使用潜在的冒犯性语言或诽谤，在一个案例中，甚至用同样的诽谤称20世纪70年代的SNL短剧“真的很有趣”，这表明对其他社区成员缺乏同情心。 -淡化工作场所性骚扰等敏感话题，这可能被解释为骚扰或创造一个不受欢迎的环境。 -随意提及涉及**的场景，这对某些观众来说可能是不合适的或触发的。 -讨论禁止或删除社区成员，这可能被视为未经许可发布私人信息。 -将他人不可接受的行为视为“神经分化”的特征，这是有问题的，因为它造成了一种刻板印象，即神经分化的人很难与之互动，需要特殊的治疗。 -过度讨论有争议的话题或过去的冲突，这可能被视为对社区讨论的持续干扰。 -使用潜在的冒犯性术语，即使是自我审查或间接提及的。 -对其他社区成员的动机和/或心理健康做出假设或猜测。 原文如下： – Defending “reverse racism” and “reverse sexism”, concepts not backed by empirical evidence, which could be seen as deliberate intimidation or creating an exclusionary environment. – Using potentially offensive language or slurs, in one case even calling an SNL skit from the 1970s using the same slur “genuinely funny”, which shows a lack of empathy towards other community members. – Making light of sensitive topics like workplace sexual harassment, which could be interpreted as harassment or creating an unwelcoming environment. – Casually mentioning scenarios involving sexual abuse, which may be inappropriate or triggering for some audiences. – Discussing bans or removals of community members, which may be seen as publishing private information without permission. – Dismissing unacceptable behavior of others as a “neurodivergent” trait, which is problematic because it creates a stereotype that neurodivergent people are hard to interact with and need special treatment. – Excessive discussion of controversial topics or past conflicts, which could be seen as sustained disruption of community discussions. – Use of potentially offensive terms, even when self-**ed or alluded to indirectly. – Making assumptions or speculations about other community members’ motivations and/or mental health. |